🔗 Share this article

Government documents reveal that ministers enacted a outlawing on the activist network despite being given warnings that such measures could “inadvertently enhance” the group’s visibility, per leaked internal records.

The Situation

The assessment paper was prepared three months prior to the official proscription of the network, which came into being to conduct protests designed to halt UK military equipment sales to Israel.

It was drafted last March by officials at the department of home affairs and the housing and communities department, assisted by counter-terrorism specialists.

Opinion Polling

Beneath the title “How would the proscription of the group be viewed by British people”, a segment of the document alerted that a ban could prove to be a polarizing matter.

It described the group as a “limited specialized organization with lower general news exposure” compared to similar activist organizations like other climate groups. Yet it highlighted that the network’s direct actions, and detentions of its supporters, received press coverage.

Experts said that surveys showed “rising discontent with Israel’s defense methods and actions in Gaza”.

Prior to its central thesis, the report cited a survey showing that three-fifths of the UK public thought Israel had gone too far in the hostilities in Gaza and that a similar number supported a restriction on arms shipments.

“These represent positions around which Palestine Action group builds its profile, organising explicitly to challenge Israel’s military exports in Britain,” the document stated.

“In the event that PAG is banned, their public image may unintentionally be amplified, attracting sympathy among sympathetic citizens who oppose the UK involvement in the Israel’s weapons trade.”

Other Risks

Officials said that the general populace were against demands from the certain outlets for strict measures, such as a ban.

Other sections of the briefing referenced surveys showing the population had a “limited knowledge” about the group.

Officials wrote that “a significant segment of the British public are probably at this time uninformed of Palestine Action and would stay that way should there be outlawing or, upon being told, would continue generally unconcerned”.

The ban under security statutes has led to protests where thousands have been apprehended for holding up placards in the streets declaring “I reject atrocities, I stand with the network”.

This briefing, which was a public reaction study, stated that a ban under terrorism laws could heighten inter-community tensions and be perceived as official partiality in support of Israel.

Officials warned policymakers and top advisers that outlawing could become “a catalyst for significant debate and censure”.

Aftermath

One leader of the group, stated that the report’s advisories had proven accurate: “Knowledge of the issues and support of the group have increased dramatically. The ban has had the opposite effect.”

The senior official at the point, the minister, announced the outlawing in June, immediately after the group’s supporters reportedly vandalized property at RAF Brize Norton in the region. Officials stated the damage was extensive.

The schedule of the report shows the proscription was being planned well before it was made public.

Ministers were informed that a outlawing might be perceived as an assault on individual rights, with the experts saying that portions of the administration as well as the wider public may view the decision as “an expansion of terrorism powers into the domain of speech rights and activism.”

Official Responses

A departmental representative commented: “The group has conducted an growing wave entailing vandalism to Britain’s critical defense sites, intimidation, and claimed attacks. These actions endangers the protection of the citizens at danger.

“Decisions on proscription are carefully considered. Decisions are guided by a comprehensive evidence-based procedure, with input from a broad spectrum of advisers from multiple agencies, the authorities and the intelligence agencies.”

A counter-terrorism law enforcement representative said: “Judgments regarding outlawing are a prerogative for the government.

“In line with public expectations, counter-terrorism policing, alongside a selection of other agencies, regularly supply information to the interior ministry to aid their work.”

The report also revealed that the Cabinet Office had been funding regular studies of public strain connected to Israel and Palestine.