European Far-Right Dictating the Political Agenda, Research Finds
Mainstream political parties are more and more enabling the radical right to set the public discourse, as per a new study carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Researchers found that this trend has unwittingly benefited far-right parties by validating their ideas and disseminating them to a broader audience.
Study Based on Over 20 Years of News Coverage
The findings, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 articles from a half-dozen national newspapers.
Capital-based researchers observed that as the radical faction shifted from marginal topics in the late 1990s to central themes like assimilation and migration, established parties increasingly adjusted their communication in reaction.
This adaptation amplified the spread of these concepts and indicated to voters that such positions were acceptable.
Implications for Democratic Systems
"Political discourse by mainstream parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the far right," explained a political sociologist participating in the study.
"This factor has been underestimated," she added.
The effect was noticeable even when mainstream parties were condemning the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the expert commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is key."
Mainstreaming Phenomenon Throughout Europe
While the research was focused on Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is likely to affect nations across the European continent.
"This is frequently observed in European media," said another co-author. "Radical groups makes a statement and everybody begins discussing it for one week."
"Even if you're countering it, you're repeating it," he stated.
Toughening of Public Discourse
At certain points, leaders have also hardened their language to match that of the radical right.
In a recently published discussion, a former German chancellor advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more often and faster."
Similar instances can be observed across Europe, as elected officials from countries including the United Kingdom to the French Republic embrace the rhetoric of the radical right, especially on migration.
This has created an echo chamber that was unthinkable a ten years prior.
Central Problem: Who Sets the Narrative?
"{If you're a moderate political group and you are talking about cultural issues – migration, integration – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the essence of narrative control," explained a researcher.
Other parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the strict platform of the radical right, despite research indicates that this approach leads the electorate to vote for the far right.
Gradual Influence and Public Perception
The scope of data collected showed that the impact of far-right parties had been gradual and had increased over time.
"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," commented a co-author. "But if you hear this negative framing around migration every second week, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."
Requirement for Established Groups to Carve Out Their Own Discourses
The research emphasized the necessity for established parties to develop their distinct discourses, particularly on subjects such as immigration and assimilation, instead of continuously trailing after the far right.
"It resembles a choreography," said one author. "When the leader is radical and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."